E-readiness of Cambodian Undergraduate Students in Using Google Classroom

Kassy Sey
The University of Cambodia
Phnom Penh, Cambodia

This short article presents an investigation of e-readiness of Cambodian undergraduate students in using Google Classroom to pursue online learning. A summary of key findings presented in this article is based on the author’s master’s research paper exploring Cambodian university students’ e-readiness in using Google Classroom (Kassy, 2019).

What is Google Classroom?

Google Classroom is a Google application with an e-learning system based on a blended learning concept that combines traditional classroom instruction with online learning (Alqahtani, 2019). On May 6, 2014, Google Classroom was announced with a limited preview available to some G Suite for Education members (Magid, 2014). It was then released publicly on August 12, 2014, and many people began to use Google Classroom for their academic purposes (Kahn, 2014). In 2015, Google integrated Google Calendar into Google Classroom for assignment due dates, field trips, and class speakers (Madhavi et al., 2018). Later in 2017, Google allowed personal Google users to join Google Classroom without the requirement of having a G Suite for Education account (Ressler, 2017). Moreover, it became possible for any personal Google user to create and teach a class on Google Classroom (Etherington, 2017). Google Classroom has both free and premium versions. The free Google Classroom is available for schools using Google Apps for Education. The premium version costs $4 per user per month and includes additional features such as advanced videoconferencing, advanced security, and premium support (Pardo-Bunte, 2021). Google Classroom is a powerful teaching and learning platform that has been modernized for today’s digital world, an offer from Google to teachers worldwide (Zhang, 2016). It provides a central location for teachers to keep in touch with their students, pose questions, and create homework or assignments.

Studies on the use of Google Classroom

Many studies showed that using online technology in the classroom could help students collaborate and achieve better learning outcomes (Chou & Chen, 2008; Raman et al., 2005; Power & Vaughan, 2010). Some studies indicated that students regarded Google Docs and Google Classroom as good group work tools (Brodahl et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2012). Many students were convinced that a document prepared collaboratively would be of higher quality than the one written alone (Blau et al., 2020). However, online collaboration may result in unpleasant learning experiences. Students and instructors, for example, might be hesitant or even reluctant to share their information (Rick & Guzdial, 2006). In addition, some students felt that changing other students’ written work was somewhat inappropriate, and they might not contribute equally to the work (Suwantarathip & Wichadee, 2014).

Because Google Classroom is primarily designed to support the education process, it offers many benefits for educational institutions (Almishiki, 2017; Fang & Holsapple, 2007). The homework function, which allows teachers to give homework/assignments to students, evaluate their work, and provide immediate feedback, is one of the strengths of Google Classroom (Alqahtani, 2019). Previous research also highlighted the necessity of addressing students’ requirements and maximizing the benefits of cloud applications such as Google Classroom, which offers positive interactions that boost students’ interests in learning and exploration (Fang & Holsapple, 2007).

Methodology  

This quantitative study employed a closed-ended questionnaire as a data collection instrument with a primary objective to investigate the e-readiness of Cambodian undergraduate students in using Google Classroom. The questionnaire was randomly distributed to undergraduate students at a Cambodian university where different information and communication technology (ICT) tools, including Google Classroom, were integrated into the learning and teaching process. A total of 110 responses were received. The questionnaire used for this study comprises six sections. They included: (1) e-readiness in Google classes, (2) content readiness, (3) technical readiness, (4) environmental readiness, (5) cultural readiness, and (6) financial readiness. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.95, suggesting the reliability of the questionnaire items.

Results

A total of 110 undergraduate students responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 48.2% were males, and 51.8% were females (see Table 1). The majority of the respondents were in the age group of 18-25, representing 81.8% of the total sample.

The data showed that Cambodian undergraduate students highly perceived that discussions via the internet could make learning meaningful. However, they believed that the most effective method of learning is still face-to-face (see Table 2). Therefore, they preferred traditional classroom instructions due to the ease of learning interactions. Furthermore, most students were highly ready to buy electronic devices and pay for the internet connection for Google Classroom purposes.

The data also showed that students were moderately willing to engage in Google Classroom. This can be understood that learning through Google Classroom is not something so familiar to them and may offer them a new and exciting learning experience. In addition, their institution provided appropriate learning materials on Google Classroom and offered practical training on how to use it. Therefore, when experiencing technical issues, they tended to be able to resolve them. However, they were moderately concerned about the recognition of qualifications obtained through learning online through Google Classroom. Moreover, it was found that few students believed government policies encouraged the use of Google Classroom in education.

Overall, with a mean score of 3.17, it could be concluded that Cambodian undergraduate students had moderate e-readiness in using Google Classroom for their academic purposes.

Discussion

It appears that in this digital age, students are generally willing to take on technological challenges and be exposed to differentiated learning through digital devices and the internet. Cambodian undergraduate students who participated in this study were in the same loop of perceptions. Google Classroom as a fast-emerging teaching and learning platform is not familiar to many Cambodian students. However, as the results of this study show, students are generally ready to use it as part of their online learning, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Studies from different countries also found that students were ready to use Google Classroom in their learning process. For example, a study conducted by Chung et al. (2020) found that Malaysian university students were ready to use Google Classroom by accessing pre-recorded lectures or videos uploaded to the platform. Bayarmaa and Lee (2018) used Google Classroom to implement problem-based learning (PBL) for Mongolian students taking Korean courses. It was found that students who participated in the course perceived Google Classroom positively, as they could use it for collaborative learning effectively.      

Conclusion

This study revealed that Cambodian undergraduate students have moderate e-readiness in using Google Classroom for academic purposes despite a significant concern over the recognition of qualifications earned through online learning using Google Classroom and the limited support from the government in the utilization of Google Classroom in education.

The main limitation of this study is that it was conducted with only 110 undergraduate students at one Cambodian private university in Phnom Penh. Therefore, the results cannot be generalizable to students in other universities both in the capital city and in the provinces. Future studies should extend the scope of the current study and examine the technology acceptance of Cambodian students from different universities to understand how they cope with the challenges and opportunities regarding e-learning. Such studies will provide concerned stakeholders with a solid understanding of the issues faced and perceived by students. This understanding is crucial, as it helps policymakers, particularly university leaders, to introduce appropriate interventions or initiatives to improve students’ online learning experiences and to enhance the quality of educational provision.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the editors of Cambodian Education Forum, especially Koemhong Sol and Kimkong Heng, for their editorial support and helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

References

Almishiki, A. (2017). Using electronic classrooms in training: Experimenting with Google Classroom. https://www.mozn.ws/13950/

Alqahtani, A. (2019). Usability testing of Google cloud applications: Students’ perspective. Journal of Technology and Science Education9(3), 326-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.585  

Bayarmaa, N., & Lee, K. (2018). A study on the application of Google Classroom for problem-based learning. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society19(7), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2018.19.7.81

Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T., & Avdiel, O. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?. The Internet and Higher Education, 45(100722), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722  

Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative writing with Web 2.0 technologies: Education students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 10, 74-103. http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol10/JITEv10IIPp073-103Brodahl948.pdf  

Chou, P. N., & Chen, H. H. (2008). Engagement in online collaborative learning: A case study using a web 2.0 tool. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching4(4), 574-582. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no4/chou_1208.pdf

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Dass, L. C. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst COVID-19. Asian Journal of University Education16(2), 46-58. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267359.pdf   

Etherington, D. (2017, April 28). Google Classroom now lets anyone school anyone else. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/27/google-classroom-now-lets-anyone-school-anyone-else/?guccounter=1

Fang, X., & Holsapple, C. W. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures’ impacts on website usability. Decision Support Systems43(2), 476-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.11.004

Kahn, J. (2014, August 12). Google Classroom now available to all apps for education users, adds collaboration features. 9TO5Google. https://9to5google.com/2014/08/12/google-classroom-now-available-to-all-apps-for-education-users-adds-collaboration-features/ 

Kassy, S. (2019). E-readiness in using Google Classroom among Cambodian undergraduate students [Unpublished Master’s Research Paper, University of Cambodia].https://www.academia.edu/49184213/E_readiness_in_using_Google_Classroom_among_Cambodian_Undergraduate_Students

Madhavi, B. K., Mohan, V., & Nalla, D. (2018). Improving attainment of graduate attributes using Google Classroom. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations31(3), 200-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2018%2Fv31i3%2F120792   

Magid, L. (2014, May 6). Google Classroom offers assignment center for students and teachers. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrymagid/2014/05/06/google-classroom-offers-control-center-for-students-and-teachers/?sh=37774b0a4d66

Pardo-Bunte, M. (2021, July 21). Google Classroom review. BetterBuys. https://www.betterbuys.com/lms/reviews/google-classroom/

Power, M., & Vaughan, N. (2010). Redesigning online learning for graduate seminar delivery. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education24(2), 19-38. http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/649

Raman, M., Ryan, T., & Olfman, L. (2005). Designing knowledge management systems for teaching and learning with Wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education16(3), 311. http://jise.org/volume16/n3/JISEv16n3p311.html        

Ressler, G. (2017, March 15). Google Classroom: Now open to even more learners. The Keyword. https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/education/google-classroom-now-open-even-more-learners/

Rick, J., & Guzdial, M. (2006). Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning1, 89-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6842-6

Suwantarathip, O., & Wichadee, S. (2014). The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 148-156. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1022935.pdf  

Zhang, M. (2016). Teaching with Google Classroom. Packt Publishing. https://www.packtpub.com/product/teaching-with-google-classroom/9781786466280

Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education24(3), 359-375. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1000688.pdf  

The Author

Kassy Sey is currently a Vice-School Principal at Creative International School of Cambodia. In 2012, he received a scholarship to undertake a bachelor’s degree in English literature at the Institute of New Khmer. Later in 2016, he received another scholarship to pursue his master’s degree in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) at The University of Cambodia. With a continuing scholarship from The University of Cambodia, he is now pursuing a PhD in educational science. His research interests involve technology in education and school leadership.

Cambodian Education Forum (CEF)

Website:www.cefcambodia.com
Email:cef.correspondence@gmail.com
Facebook:www.facebook.com/CEF.Cambodia
Twitter:www.twitter.com/CEFCambodia  

  CEF accepts no responsibility for facts presented and views expressed.

  Responsibility rests solely with the individual authors.

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s